Why Is a Strong Discussion Section Important in Research?

The discussion section's goal is to explain any new knowledge or insights that resulted from your study as well as to evaluate and explain the importance of your results in light of what was previously known about the research topic under investigation. The research questions or hypotheses under dissertation writing services and the literature you reviewed will always link the discussion to the introduction. 

However, the discussion does more than just restate or reorganise the first sections of your paper; it explains in detail how your study improved the reader's comprehension of the research problem from where you left them at the conclusion of your review of previous research as provided by the scholars of dissertation discussion writing help UK based. Your voice will be heard most prominently in the comment area.

Discussion Research Value 

Your research paper's discussion portion is frequently regarded as its most crucial element since it:

best exemplifies your capacity as a researcher to critically analyse a problem, come up with innovative solutions based on a rational synthesis of the data, and create a deeper, more comprehensive grasp of the research subject being studied in critical analysis section.

explains the fundamental significance of your research, identifies potential ramifications for other fields of study, and considers potential enhancements that may be done to advance the goals of your study.

draws attention to the significance of your research and how it might help comprehend the research challenge in your field.

explains how your study's results identified and filled in previously undiscovered or inadequately explained gaps in the literature; and,

encourages the reader to consider problems in-depth and holistically, not merely based on the objective presentation of facts, but also on your interpretation of the results supported by evidence.

Writing Style and Structure

1. Overarching Guidelines

When writing your explanation of the results, you should follow these broad guidelines:

• Avoid being wordy or repetitious; instead, be succinct and make your views obvious.

• Steer clear of jargon and vague technical terms.

• Adhere to a rational line of reasoning; Generally speaking, analyse and talk about the importance of your findings in the same order that you presented them in your results section. [One noteworthy exception is to start by emphasising a surprising outcome or discovery that might catch the reader's attention.]

• Refer to specific works or earlier research in the past tense, but use the present verb tense when discussing established truths.

• Use subheadings as necessary to help structure your conversation or classify your interpretations into themes.

2. The Information

Your paper's discussion section typically contains the following information:

• Results explanation: Discuss whether or not each set of results was predicted; elaborate on findings that were surprising or particularly significant. If applicable, highlight any odd or unexpected patterns or trends that surfaced from your findings and discuss how they relate to the research question.

• Citations to earlier studies: Either utilise the research to bolster a point or compare your findings with those of other studies. This might involve going over essential sources that were previously referenced in your literature review section again, or if they are more crucial to compare with your findings, saving them for citation in the discussion part instead of being a part of the general literature review of prior research used to provide context and background information. Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion section.

• Deductive reasoning: An assertion on the broader applicability of the findings. For instance, outlining lessons learnt, offering suggestions that might assist a situation become better, or emphasising results that guide best practices.

• A hypothesis is a broader assertion or potential inference drawn from the data that might be validated or refuted by further investigation. This might be presented as fresh research questions that resulted from your investigation.

3. Structure and Organisation

As you plan and compose your paper's discussion part, bear the following sequential elements in mind:

• Consider your conversation to be an inverted pyramid. Link your results to the literature, then to theory, and finally to practice [if applicable] to structure the conversation from the general to the specific.

• Utilise the same verb tense [present], narrative style, and essential words that you used in your introduction to describe the study topic.

• Start by restating the research problem you were looking into in brief and then respond to each of the research questions you raised in the introduction that support the problem.

• Explain each of the key results' linkages, trends, and guiding principles and put them in the right context. The order in which this information is presented is crucial.

4. Overarching Goals

The following should be among the goals of your discussion section:

Restate the Research Problem and Highlight the Key Findings

• After briefly restating the research problem or difficulties you are examining and the techniques you employed to address them, swiftly go on to discuss the study's main conclusions. A straightforward, clear, and concise statement of the study's findings should be written; this should typically be one paragraph.

5. Describe the Significance of the Results and Their Significance

• Nobody has given your studies as much consideration as you have. Give a methodical explanation of the significance of your results and why you think they are important. You want the reader to consider the findings critically after reading the discussion section.

Conclusion

The results of your study and how you interpret them in light of the research challenge should be the key topics of the discussion section. For instance, it would not be appropriate to make assumptions about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without using existing studies to support your claim or if your original research design did not include analysis of other countries. This is especially true if your goal was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among disadvantaged children in Bangladesh. If you are forced to theorise about alternative outcomes, do so by outlining potential repercussions or implications and providing an explanation for why you are expanding your research into these domains.